Lucara Names 1,758ct. Diamond ‘Rare Find’

Lucara 1758 carat sewelo

Botswana’s largest rough diamond now has a name, following a public contest held by Lucara Diamond Corp.

The company chose to call the 1,758-carat stone Sewelô, which means “rare find” in the local Setswana language. It was the winning entry from more than 22,000 submissions.

“The largest diamond recovered in Botswana’s history was named by the people of Botswana this evening in a celebration of Botswana’s success,” Lucara CEO Eira Thomas said last week.

The miner has completed its analysis of the diamond — which it recovered in April from the Karowe mine’s high-value south lobe — and is considering its sale options, Thomas added.

Lucara announced the new name during a gala event, at which Botswana President Mokgweetsi Masisi was present.

Source: Diamonds.net

AGD finds exceptional 47.61 carat deep lemon yellow at Grib

48 carat rough yellow diamond

AGD Diamonds, the firm that operates and owns the Grib diamond mine in northern Central Russia announced it has recovered a gem-quality, deep lemon yellow diamond, weighing 47.61 carats, on July 13, 2019.

The stone was found during the ore processing at Grib’s processing plant. In a news release in Russian, AGD said the diamond is of an extremely rare deep lemon hue and is classified as a “high end stone.” Experts noted its perfect octahedral shape and its high – flawless – clarity.

The company noted that the stone has been recovered undamaged thanks to the mine’s innovative, advanced mining technologies and processing by means of its XRT system.

Source: IDEX

Gem Diamonds recovers 140ct. Rough

Gem Diamonds 140 carat rough

Gem Diamonds has recovered a white diamond weighing 140 carats, the second over 100 carats it has reported this year.

It found the high-quality stone on July 6 at its Letšeng mine in Lesotho, the company said Monday. In March, it found a 161-carat white diamond at the deposit.

The miner recently recovered two yellow diamonds from Letšeng weighing more than 100 carats. It retrieved a 134-carat stone in March, and another weighing 135-carats last month.

So far this year, Gem Diamonds has recovered four diamonds over 100 carats. In 2018, it unearthed a total of 15.

Source: Diamonds.net

Brewing Diamond Industry Crisis Prompts De Beers to Cut Output

De Beers

De Beers trimmed its production plans for this year as the world’s biggest diamond producer responds to a brewing industry crisis that’s hitting demand for its stones.

The Anglo American Plc unit will now mine about 31 million carats in 2019, at the bottom end of a previous forecast range. The company, once the monopoly supplier of diamonds, has a longstanding strategy to match supply with demand.

The diamond industry’s engine room, dominated by family-run businesses that cut, polish and trade the stones, is struggling to make money amid a flood of polished diamonds and stagnant consumer purchasing. That’s led to a slump in demand for the rough stones that De Beers mines from Botswana to Canada.

De Beers Diamond Sales Keep Dropping as Weak Patch Drags on

The weakness is showing up in the company’s sales, which are down about $500 million so far this year compared with 2018. The company has already gone unusually far in offering flexibility for its customers — allowing them to defer agreed purchases and lower the number of diamonds they plan to buy this year.

De Beers had already planned to produce a lot less diamonds than last year, when it dug up more than 35 million carats, the most since the global financial crisis. First-half output of the stones was 15.6 million carats, 11% lower than in 2018. The average selling price also fell 7%.

“Demand for rough diamonds remains subdued as a result of challenges in the midstream, with higher polished inventories, and caution due to macro-economic uncertainty, including the U.S.- China trade tensions,” Anglo said Thursday.

Macquarie Group Ltd. said before today’s announcement that it expects De Beers to post first-half profit of $567 million. While that’s down on last year, it’s performing far better than its smaller rivals, many of whom have seen their market values plummet to multi-year lows.

Source: bloomberg

Alrosa Partners with Zimbabwe Mining Company

Alrosa diamonds rough

Alrosa has agreed to a joint venture with national miner Zimbabwe Consolidated Diamond Company (ZCDC) for exploring new diamond projects in the country.

The deal, which provides Alrosa with a 70% stake in any new greenfield deposits, encompasses geological exploration, diamond mining and independent sales of rough stones to external markets, the Russian miner said Tuesday.

“We are committed to productive work in the exploration of new, promising areas and subsequent diamond mining,” explained Alrosa deputy CEO Vladimir Marchenko. “Our specialists have been working in Zimbabwe for more than three months now, and the national authorities have been of great support to them. We have chosen various projects for the joint venture, and part of [those] will be launched this autumn.”

The company is primarily considering areas located in the Chimanimani region of Zimbabwe, Marchenko noted, stressing that Alrosa did not plan any operations in Marange, despite recent reports indicating it was considering the move. Zimbabwe’s Marange fields were a source of contention, after state security forces killed nearly 200 citizens in 2008 in an effort to clamp down on informal mining, resulting in the country’s removal from the Kimberley Process (KP). The KP reinstated Zimbabwe in 2011, but US sanctions against Marange diamonds remain in place.

“Alrosa only explores and considers the feasibility [in] other parts of the country,” it said. “[The company] has never, and under no circumstances, considered, and won’t consider, the possibility of entering the Marange region.”

In December, the miner established Alrosa Zimbabwe Limited, an affiliate company that will oversee all projects in the country.

Source: Diamonds.net

Venezuelans go after diamond-backed cryptocurrency Ponzi with $30M lawsuit

crypto currency

A group of Venezuelans that moved to the US to “start a new life” are suing a $30 million cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme that allegedly backed its coins with real diamonds.

On Friday last week, a group of Venezuelans submitted a lawsuit claiming they were fraudulently promised massive returns on investments into the supposed diamond-backed cryptocurrency, Argyle Coin, Law360 reports.

The perpetrators, Jose Angel Aman, Harold Seigel, and his son Jonathan Seigel, were reportedly running two diamond companies – Natural Diamonds and Eagle Financial – and an associated cryptocurrency business that offered the diamond-backed digital assets. According to the report, the perps defrauded over 300 investors.

The group of Venezuelans said they were amateur investors and were sucked into the $30 million scheme after being misled by promises of big returns. Natural Diamonds said it would buy and cut raw diamonds to sell on for a 24-percent return.

The Venezuelans initially invested in Eagle Financial, which also leveraged Seigel’s reputation as a supposed diamond expert to trade high-end diamonds.

“[Eagle Financial] and its principals overstated their experience in the diamond and jewelry businesses to lure investors into trusting [Eagle Financial] and its principals with their investment,” the court document reads.

In reality, the funds that were invested in Eagle Financial and Natural Diamonds were being used to repay earlier investors.

Eventually money ran out, so Aman created Argyle Coin to continue luring investors in an attempt to keep the scheme running. Argyle Coin reportedly offered “risk-free” investments into a diamond-backed cryptocurrency.

However, the digital asset was never developed. The funds beguiled from investors were again used to pay off earlier investors of Eagle Financial and Natural Diamonds.

Aman, Seigel, and Seigel allegedly secured the cryptocurrency with a $25 million performance bond and physical diamonds. But the Venezuelan’s calls for evidence of this and for access to digital wallets containing Argyle Coins, went unanswered.

A troubling cryptocurrency
In April, more than a dozen lawsuits were filed by those lured by Aman and his fake diamonds and cryptocurrency, Palm Beach Daily News reported.

In May this year, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a suit against Argyle Coin forcing it to cease trading and freeze its accounts, calling it a Ponzi scheme. The halt also prevented Argyle Coin from undertaking its initial coin offering.

All three of Aman’s firms were charged at the time, The Wall Street Journal reports.

The scheme began in 2014 when Aman began offering investments in Natural Diamonds, promising the return of 24 percent on top of initial investments, within two years.

Aman and his accomplices then sold investment contracts in Eagle Financial in 2015, and used the funds to repay earlier investors, WSJ says. Aman was also said to be using the funds to live a “lavish lifestyle,” another report stated. Eventually Argyle Coin was created to perpetuate the scheme.

The group of seven Venezuelans are the latest to join a growing list of parties going after Argyle Coin and its deceptive “creators.”

Source: thenextweb.com

Jobs hit as diamond industry cuts output

The US and China consume 60 per cent of the world’s production of diamonds. Recently consumer demand in these key markets is either depressed or subdued due to various reasons.

MSME-dominated diamond cutting and polishing industry is facing a crisis. Several units have reduced their production days and thousands of labourers have gone out of job. Working capital crunch, sluggish demand from China and falling polished diamond prices have been affecting the industry. Jewellery makers too are worried about the increase in the customs duty of gold and silver.

“At least 30 per cent of the MSMEs, which are into polishing works, have reduced their capacity utilization.

Instead of six days, now they are working five days. These are units that procure raw materials from larger companies and return them after polishing. Further, several units in Saurashtra and north Gujarat are affected to the extent that thousands have gone out of job. These units employ 10 to 15 workers. Around 10,000 to 15,000 are out of work and have returned to agricultural jobs,” said Dinesh Navadiya, Member of Surat Diamond Association.

According to him, multiple issues are affecting the industry. Companies have been facing working capital crunch due to shortage of bank finance. While domestic banks have cut their borrowing limits to the gems and jewellery sector, the PNB scam has also made it difficult for exporters to credit from international agencies for buying roughs. Delayed GST refunds too are blocking the working capital.

“Liquidity crunch and lack of adequate finance to the sector have added to the woes. This has resulted in factories limiting their production,” said GJEPC Chairman Pramod Kumar Agrawal.

The off-take of polished diamonds by China either directly or through Hong Kong has come down considerably with the trade war. Weaker Yuan has made imports costly for the jewellery sector.

“The US and China consume 60 per cent of the world’s production of diamonds. Recently consumer demand in these key markets is either depressed or subdued due to various reasons. There is a recessionary trend in China. Retail sales are down. The US-China trade war is adding to the volatility and uncertainty. There is destocking by retailers in major consuming countries such as the US and China and they are not reordering,” said Agrawal.

While the demand is slow, the polished diamond prices too have been coming down. Diamonds of one carat and more have been seeing continuous erosion of prices. This has forced the companies to limit their rough purchases. In caratage terms, import of rough diamonds and export of polished diamonds are down by around 23 per cent in the first two months of this fiscal. It was down 13 per cent in last fiscal.

Source: mydigitalfc

India Differentiates Synthetics Imports

Lab grown rough diamond

India has introduced an import classification code solely for lab-grown rough diamonds, enabling the industry to keep better watch of synthetics entering the country.

The government has separated the Indian Trade Clarification (ITC) code for rough synthetic gemstones into diamonds and non-diamonds, the Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC) reported last week. The move will help organizations such as the GJEPC track the precise quantities of lab-grown diamonds coming into the market, explained Colin Shah, the council’s vice chairman.

Previously, all rough synthetic gemstones carried the same Indian import code — 71042000 — whether they were man-made diamonds or other stones. From now on, rough lab-grown diamonds will fall into 71042010, while other rough synthetic stones will be assigned 71042090. Trade data for the two categories is likely to be available starting in August, the GJEPC said. Natural rough diamonds will retain their code of 71023100.

ITC codes are unique numbers for each type of product, and are based on the international Harmonized System (HS) of codes. The government announced the change in last week’s Union Budget, following lobbying by the GJEPC.

“This will go a long way in strengthening the efforts of the council to monitor the two pipelines and maintain their integrity,” said GJEPC chairman Pramod Agrawal.

India already has the distinction for polished: Synthetic diamonds carry the ITC code 71049010, while other polished synthetic gemstones are labeled 71049090. However, until now, the GJEPC has chosen not to publish the official trade figures for synthetic diamonds in its monthly data release, instead providing one total for all synthetic polished gemstones, including diamonds, and an equivalent for rough. It’s in the process of changing its reporting methods, and will soon publicize the whole range of available data across rough and polished, it confirmed.

India is one of the first countries to keep close tabs on lab-grown trading, the GJEPC claimed. China already has a similar distinction for its import codes, while the European Union will adopt a Combined Nomenclature (CN) customs code for synthetic diamonds on January 1, 2020, the GJEPC added. Australia and Russia are likely to follow suit, it noted.

The budget — the country’s first since the reelection of Prime Minister Narendra Modi — also saw the introduction of an online service enabling small and medium-sized enterprises to obtain loans of up to INR 10 million ($146,000) within 59 minutes. The government will allocate INR 3.5 billion ($51 million) to subsidize interest repayments for companies of that size that are registered for the nation’s goods and services tax. The initiatives are open to a range of industries, including jewelry.

Additionally, the government will charge a 2% “tax deducted at source” on cash withdrawals exceeding INR 10 million ($146,000) to discourage cash payment for business purposes.

Source: Diamonds.net

Red And Pink Diamonds Are Tendered By Rio Tinto

Argyle pink diamonds

Rio Tinto displayed 64 diamonds weighing a total of 56.28 carats, all from its Argyle mine site, in the east Kimberley region of Western Australia, the mining giant said today.

The diamonds make up the 2019 Argyle Pink Diamonds Tender.

Rio Tinto highlighted six diamonds all at or under 2.01 carats:

Argyle red diamond
Argyle red diamond

Lot 1: Argyle Enigma™,1.75 carat modified radiant Fancy Red diamond

Lot 2: Argyle Amari™, 1.48 carat heart shaped Fancy Vivid Purplish Pink diamond

Lot 3: Argyle Elysian™, 1.20 carat modified cushion shaped Fancy Vivid Pink diamond

Lot 4: Argyle Verity™,1.37 carat oval shaped Fancy Vivid Purplish Pink diamond

Lot 5: Argyle Opus™, 2.01 carat round shaped Fancy Intense Pink diamond

Lot 6: Argyle Avenoir™, 1.07 carat oval shaped Fancy Red diamond

The mine, nearly four decades old, is nearing its end.

“Rio Tinto’s Argyle mine is the first and only ongoing source of rare pink diamonds in history,” said Rio Tinto Copper & Diamonds chief executive, Arnaud Soirat, in a news release.

“With the lifecycle of this extraordinary mine approaching its end, we have seen, and continue to see, unstoppable demand for these truly limited-edition diamonds and strong value appreciation.”

JCK Lab-Grown Section Shows Rising Demand

JCK lab grown diamonds

At JCK Las Vegas, lab-grown-diamond exhibitors have mushroomed nearly as much as opinions about the stones themselves. To accommodate growing market needs, organizers debuted the Lab-Grown Diamond Neighborhood at the 2018 edition of the trade fair.

“There may have been exhibitors that had lab-grown in the show in earlier years, but they weren’t grouped together in a neighborhood until 2018,” says Sarin Bachmann, event vice president for JCK and Luxury. “Lab-grown diamonds are a growing segment, and it became important for our buyers to have clear delineation of the category.”

This is why the show added a 6,400-square-foot designated section for 29 lab-grown exhibitors to display both loose stones and finished jewelry last year. It’s also why the area increased its footprint by 40% this year, with nearly double the number of participants.

‘They’re not going away’

Proponents of lab-created diamonds see opportunities for the stones to share case space with mined ones, as lab-grown constitutes another way for consumers to spend discretionary dollars on jewelry as opposed to other product categories.

Indeed, lab-created diamonds helped fourth-generation jeweler Pia Aiya’s family business stay afloat during the recession. “Lab-growns came out of need but grew into something more,” says the Aiya Designs director of operations. “They are another avenue or tool.”

Raj Vaidya, owner of six-month-old DiamSpark Lab Grown Diamonds, agrees. “They’re not going away,” says Vaidya, whose parent company has been in the mined-diamond industry for 25 years.

“The affordability of lab-growns has increased the public’s awareness of them,” he adds. “And the industry is actually buying them in large-scale quantities — like 1,000 at a time. They are not on memo.”

Price may be the biggest factor in customers’ purchasing decisions — synthetic diamonds can cost a third of what natural ones do, according to interviewees — while sustainability and transparent sourcing are close behind.

Evolv, a division of longtime manufacturer Joseph Blank, dipped its toes in the lab-grown-jewelry waters in 2016, though sales have been slow until recently. Now the business is every bit as viable as mined diamonds.

“There’s less resistance from consumers and more from the industry, though we continue to get gradual increases in requests for them,” explains CEO Douglas Blank. “Our company is 100 years old, and lab-growns are keeping me busy and our phones ringing.”

Of course, the individual purchase figures can look disappointingly low compared to natural. “We just sold a 3.50-carat lab-grown stone for $13,000 that would have been $30,000 in a mined diamond,” he relates.

Demand for more

Of all the pros and cons, the most compelling argument for selling lab-created diamonds is that consumers are buying them.

For Sehal Mody, chief operations officer at GoGreen Diamonds, the proof is in the sales. His firm — a four-year-old division of a 40-year-old natural-diamond-jewelry manufacturer — has gone from making about two sales a month 10 years ago to getting retailer requests for entire showcases full of both loose lab-grown diamonds and finished jewelry.

“Retailers are looking for bridal and fashion basics,” he reports.

The biggest impetus for sales? Lightbox. Before the De Beers lab-grown jewelry line emerged, many merchants were hesitant to embrace this product category. Now sales are heating up, as is evident from the expanding Lab-Grown Diamond Neighborhood at JCK. At press time, JCK Las Vegas was still finalizing plans for the section’s further growth in 2020. Blank has already requested a booth double the size of this year’s.

“Lightbox really opened up the market,” affirms Mody.

Fenix, another lab-grown company, used virtual reality at its JCK booth to present the gems as a product that offered consumers a choice. In a five-minute experience, retailers could see the growing and cutting processes for themselves — the latter carried out at a factory in India.

“We’re not looking to pick a fight about what’s better or not,” says brand-builder Andrea Hansen, who aided Fenix with its campaign. “But we are well-equipped for volume, from 30 points to 3 carats and more. Lab-growns could dominate the fashion space.”

Bigger as they go

That speculation paves the way for the inevitable question of what’s next for synthetics. Many are saying bigger pieces of finished jewelry, and definitely more sales — though how much more is anybody’s guess.

“The percentage of lab-grown sales may just be 2% now, but if 2% becomes 3%, then we’ve seen a 50% jump,” says Kinish Shah, owner of Splendid Lab Diamonds. A 27-year veteran of natural diamonds under Surediam, his company began working in synthetics three years ago.

Of course, proponents of both types of diamonds exist and have “diamond dreams,” according to Hiren Goti, CEO of newcomer SkyLabDiamond. He says he doesn’t understand the negative opinions about lab-grown. “I don’t know why people are so worried. You can’t stop shoppers from buying what they want. It’s their choice.”

Lightbox liaisons

Members of De Beers’ Lightbox team remained cool under questioning at JCK Las Vegas as they addressed a packed conference room about the company’s lab-grown-jewelry product. That included queries about those who might manipulate inscriptions on stones larger than 0.20 carats to deceive buyers.

“We’re not here to police the rest of the industry,” said chief merchandising officer Sally Morrison, “but we could maybe work with the International Grown Diamond Association [IGDA] to help create standards for the overall health of the sector and to not undermine consumer confidence.”

Lightbox CEO Steve Coe offered clear communication about the manufacturing process for the brand’s fashion-forward pink and blue colors, which come in basic styles like studs and pendants.

He also pointed to broader gifting opportunities like sweet-16 presents at retail prices ranging from $200 to $1,000.

In addition, the stones aren’t graded, which reinforces the fact that they’re manufactured like other mass-produced items. “There’s not one that’s better or worse than any other in the lineup,” said Coe.

Meanwhile, women of all ages and ethnicities have said they find the jewelry appealing and feel pretty wearing it, according to brand research and video testimonies. And Lightbox’s $94 million investment in a manufacturing facility in Gresham, Oregon, which is slated to become operational in early 2020, signals how important the US market is for Lightbox’s business.

This article was first published in the July 2019 issue of Rapaport Magazine.