The US is almost certain to go ahead and impose a 37 per cent tariff on all goods imported from Botswana, starting tomorrow 1 August.
That is one of the highest rates of tariff being introduced by the US.
Botswana, the world’s second biggest diamond producer after Russia, has been actively seeking dialogue with the US government to reverse or mitigate the tariff, but without success.
Last month President Duma Boko said tariff imposed on Botswana worsened the already bleak future faced by the diamond industry, and were likely to hinder efforts to grow the African economy.
Most of Botswana’s rough diamonds are sold direct to India, Belgium, and the UAE, but goods worth around $500m annually are exported to the US and will be subject to tariffs. Until now diamonds have been zero-rated.
US importers will have to pay a total of 37 per cent in duties. The reciprocal duty includes the 10 per cent baseline duty that was imposed back in April.
The tariff rules for Botswana, and most other countries, are unlike those for India, where the reciprocal tariff is in addition to the baseline 10 per cent. US-bound diamonds represent a modest slice of Botswana’s total diamond export business, and most of the country’s diamond revenue is not directly affected by the new US tariff.
It is, however, another blow to a country that relies on diamonds for the vast majority of its export revenue, and that has seen foreign sales halve amid the global downturn.
When choosing a precious metal for a custom-made ring, the two most popular options are 18-carat gold andWhen choosing a precious metal for a custom-made ring, the two most popular options are 18-carat gold and platinum. Both metals are prized for their beauty, durability, and prestige, but they differ significantly in terms of cost, weight, and long-term maintenance. Whether you’re designing a bespoke engagement ring, a wedding band, or a statement piece, understanding the key differences between 18K gold and platinum will help you make an informed decision.
Material Comparison: 18K Gold vs. Platinum
1. Purity and Composition
18K Gold is made up of 75% pure gold and 25% alloy metals (such as copper, silver, or palladium), which influence its colour and strength. It is available in yellow, white, or rose tones.
Platinum is typically 95% pure, making it denser and more hypoallergenic than gold. It retains its naturally white colour over time without the need for rhodium plating.
2. Weight
Platinum is approximately 60% heavier than gold. For example, a ring that weighs 5 grams in 18K gold would weigh about 8 grams if made in platinum. This weight difference gives platinum rings a more substantial feel but also impacts the price.
Cost Breakdown: Gold vs. Platinum Ring
Example: Classic Solitaire Ring Design
Feature
18K Gold (5g)
Platinum (8g)
Metal Cost per Gram
AUD $123-145
AUD $73 -85
Total Metal Cost
AUD $615–725
AUD $584–680
Crafting Charges
AUD $300–500
AUD $400–600
Total Estimated Cost
AUD $915–1125
AUD $984–1280
Note: These figures are approximations and vary based on ring design complexity, jeweller’s rates, and daily bullion prices.
Why Choose 18K Gold?
Affordable luxury: Gold offers the prestige of a precious metal at a more accessible price.
Colour variety: Choose from yellow, white, or rose tones to suit your personal style.
Classic and timeless: 18K is the standard for luxury jewellery, combining durability with rich colour.
Why Choose Platinum?
Exceptional durability: Platinum is more resistant to wear and ideal for heirloom pieces.
Hypoallergenic: A top choice for sensitive skin.
Low-maintenance: Maintains its natural white lustre without plating.
Choosing between 18K gold and platinum comes down to your budget, lifestyle, and personal preferences. If you’re looking for a lighter, more affordable option with colour flexibility, 18K gold is a great choice. If you value longevity, weight, and purity, platinum may be worth the higher investment.
Either way, a well-crafted ring in either metal will provide a lifetime of beauty and meaning. Always consult with a reputable jeweller to discuss your design and get an accurate quote based on current metal prices.
President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi
India’s diamond industry today (30 July) had its worst fears confirmed as the US announced all imports would be subject to 25 per cent tariffs, effective as of Friday (1 August).
In addition it will face an unspecified extra penalty for buying military equipment, oil and other goods from Russia.
Lingering hopes of a last-minute deal to avoid the additional tariffs were crushed when President Donald Trump singled out India, the world’s biggest diamond manufacturer, for special mention on his Truth Social platform.
“While India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country,” he wrote.
Kirit Bhansali, chairman of the India’s Gem and Jewelry Export Promotion Council (GJEPC) reacted to the news saying: “This is a deeply concerning development. The Indian gem and jewellery sector, in particular, stands to be severely impacted.
“The United States is our single largest market, accounting for over $10 billion in exports – nearly 30% of our industry’s total global trade.
“A blanket tariff of this magnitude will place immense pressure on every part of the value chain.”
Colin Shah, managing director of diamond jewelry manufacturer Kama Jewelry, reacted to today’s news, said: “With the US being one of the key export destinations, this will severely impact the sectors like gems and jewellery that are heavily dependent on exports.
“Going ahead, we expect trade activities to remain muted with U.S. However, we also need to wait and watch how the situation unfolds.”
Less than two weeks ago, Trump said the US and India were “very close” to reaching an interim agreement, but those talks stalled, primarily over agricultural and dairy goods.
And only days ago US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told reporters: “We continue to speak with our Indian counterparts. We’ve always had very constructive discussions with them.”
Richemont reported another increase in jewelry sales in the three months to 30 June, but saw its watch revenue dip again.
The Swiss luxury goods conglomerate said its jewelry maisons – including Cartier, Van Cleef & Arpels, Buccellati, Piaget and Vhernier – saw sales increase by 11 per cent at constant exchange rates during Q1 FY2026 to EUR 2.914bn (USD 3.359bn).
It marks the third consecutive quarter of double-digit growth. In Q4 2025 the increase was 8 per cent.
Richemont said sales had been boosted in Europe, Americas, and Middle East & Africa by a robust recovery in tourism local spending. All regions posted increases, except for Japan.
But watch sales declined by 7 per cent to EUR 824m (USD 950m), mainly due to downturns in China and Japan, but offset by double-digit growth in the Americas.
Consumers were cautious, switching from high-end to mid-range watches from Richemont’s brands – A. Lange & Söhne, Baume & Mercier, IWC Schaffhausen, Jaeger-LeCoultre, Panerai, Piaget, Roger Dubuis and Vacheron Constantin.
Watches and jewelry account for almost 90 per cent of Richemont’s total revenue (the rest is fashion and accessories).
Across the entire group sales increased 6 per cent to EUR 5.4bn (USD 6.23bn) despite macroeconomic volatility.
Lab-grown diamonds are transforming the global diamond industry especially the engagement ring sector offering consumers genuine diamonds at more accessible prices. These man-made stones are chemically, physically, and optically identical to mined diamonds but appeal to modern buyers with their affordability, ethical production, and growing market acceptance.
What Are Lab-Grown Diamonds?
Produced using High Pressure High Temperature (HPHT) or Chemical Vapour Deposition (CVD), lab-grown diamonds are real diamonds, not simulants like cubic zirconia. They share the same crystal structure and brilliance as mined stones, and require advanced gemmological equipment for origin detection.
Why Are They Gaining Popularity?
Affordability remains the primary driver. Lab-grown diamonds are typically 40–70% less expensive than natural diamonds of similar quality, allowing consumers to choose larger or higher-quality stones without exceeding their budget.
Ethical and environmental concerns are also influencing buyers. With no mining required, lab-grown diamonds reduce the risk of conflict sourcing and environmental degradation, appealing to younger generations who value transparency and sustainability.
Market Impact
Lab-grown diamonds now represent over 50% of the U.S. engagement ring market, with rapid uptake among millennials and Gen Z. Cities with a strong technology and education base lead the trend, while manufacturers particularly in China are scaling production to meet global demand.
Industry Response
The rise of lab-grown diamonds has disrupted the traditional diamond supply chain. Major miners like De Beers have reduced their market outlook, while smaller players like Gem Diamonds and Burgundy Diamond Mines have faced operational challenges.
Traditional diamond brands are repositioning mined diamonds as luxury items, focusing on rarity, heritage, and emotional value, while also reinforcing the investment case for natural stones.
Certification and Detection
DCLA plays a vital role in distinguishing between natural and lab-grown diamonds. We use advanced spectroscopic analysis, growth structure detection, and laser inscription verification to ensure accurate origin classification. Our grading reports clearly identify whether a diamond is natural or laboratory-created, helping maintain trust and transparency in the market.
Investment and Resale Considerations
While both lab-grown and natural diamonds offer identical beauty and durability, resale value currently favours natural diamonds, which tend to retain more long-term value. This distinction remains important for buyers considering heirloom or investment purposes.
Looking Ahead
The lab-grown diamond market is expected to continue growing, particularly in the engagement ring segment. With improvements in production efficiency and sustainability, consumer adoption is poised to accelerate further.
At DCLA, we remain committed to providing accurate certification, expert grading, and clear identification for both natural and lab-grown diamonds supporting consumer confidence and industry integrity in a rapidly evolving marketplace.
De Beers is expected to report a loss for the first half 2025 despite an uptick in sales during the second quarter.
Sales for H1 were down 13 per cent year-on-year, according to a production report published last Thursday (24 July) by parent company Anglo American. But Q2 showed a 14 per cent increase on the same period in 2024.
De Beers said the last three sights raised $1.185bn, buoyed by the sale of specific assortments at lower margins due to “stock rebalancing initiatives” or discounts on inventory.
So although revenue was higher compared with Q2 2024 ($1.039bn) Anglo said it expects to report negative underlying EBITDA for De Beers in the first half of 2025.
It also noted that “a formal process for the sale of De Beers is advancing, despite the current challenging market conditions”.
Rough diamond trading conditions remained challenged, it said, though improved industry sentiment at the end of the first quarter led to stabilization of polished diamond prices.
“But uncertainty surrounding U.S. tariffs announced in April subsequently slowed polished trading,” it said.
“In contrast to the ongoing challenging trading conditions, consumer demand for diamond jewellery remained broadly stable in the first half of the year.”
Meanwhile production decreased by 36 per cent to 4.1m carats in Q2, reflecting a planned production response to the prolonged period of lower demand. The biggest quarterly drops were in Botswana (-44 per cent) and Canada (-46 per cent). South Africa production actually rose 17 per cent.
Production guidance for 2025 is unchanged at 20 to 23m carats (actual production for 2024 was 24.7m carats) and average per carat price at $94 (actual average for 2024 was $152).
Dubai’s ascent in the global diamond trade is undeniable, yet its polished diamond business now confronts a critical threat. Opaque regulations, punitive taxes, and mounting costs are pushing diamantaires, particularly from key markets, to look elsewhere – a stark reminder of past industry shifts that demand urgent, decisive action to preserve its hard-won leadership.
A century ago, Dubai stood as the undisputed pearling capital of the world, yet the advent of cultured pearls ushered in an overnight shift that shattered that dominance, forcing the emirate to adapt, pivot, and ultimately thrive through oil, trade, and tourism. History, however, whispers a stark warning: once a hub loses its competitive edge, recovery often remains out of reach. Today, as Dubai asserts its pre-eminence in the global diamond sector, particularly as the world’s leading hub for rough diamonds since 2021 and a top-three global centre overall, its polished diamond business stands at a similar precipice. Mounting tax ambiguities, punitive regulations, and soaring operational costs threaten to drive traders away, risking a mass exodus that could see its hard-won sparkle fade for good.
Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that Dubai’s journey to becoming a global trading powerhouse is truly exceptional. Dubai’s rise to eminence did not come easy. I have had the honour to work for over 12 years with Ahmed Bin Sulayem, Executive Chairman and CEO at Dubai Multi Commodities Centre (DMCC). Under his outstanding leadership, Dubai’s diamond sector had to sail through difficult weather, often culminating in storms instigated by NGOs who on their turn often were pushed against Dubai by competing entities.
However, bearing in mind the Ruler of Dubai, HRH Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum’s mantra: “In the race to excellence there is no finish line,” Dubai meticulously cultivated an ecosystem of world-class infrastructure, unmatched connectivity, and a business-friendly environment.
This soon propelled Dubai to the forefront of the gold and rough diamond trade. In 2024, its polished diamond trade alone surged past USD 13.1 billion, contributing to a remarkable cumulative total (rough and polished) of USD 57.5 billion over the past five years. Growing by a staggering 32 per cent to USD 16.9bn in 2023, polished diamonds represent nearly 50 per cent of the UAE’s total diamond trade, underscoring their pivotal role in its strategic expansion.
In the same spirit, any business, company and government entity – no matter how successful it becomes – has to keep a deep sense of self-criticism and always check for weaknesses and threats. Indeed, despite these impressive figures and inherent advantages, a significant share of the global polished diamond trade, particularly from key players in Israel, continue to bypass the UAE in favour of direct routes to established markets such as the United States, Antwerp, and Hong Kong. Through a combination of predictable regulatory landscapes, deep pools of experienced professionals, and often, more favourable tax treatments for polished diamonds, each of these centres have instilled greater business confidence, and all this despite the recently enacted U.S. trade tariffs. For Dubai to truly hold on to, and leverage opportunities presented by agreements like the Abraham Accords in boosting the UAE-Israel polished diamond trade, the UAE must urgently address its existing and forthcoming structural barriers.
One of the most critical obstacles is the existing VAT framework. While the UAE applies a reverse-charge VAT mechanism to rough diamonds, this crucial benefit does not consistently extend to polished diamonds, thereby diminishing Dubai’s global competitiveness. Although Cabinet Decision No. 127 in January 2025 aimed to extend the VAT reverse-charge mechanism to polished diamonds and a broader range of precious stones, for many, this feels like too little, too late. This inconsistency, coupled with high corporate tax rates directly undermines the UAE’s ability to attract high-value polished diamond activity and compete effectively. As an example, in Belgium and the U.S., inter-company diamond trades are entirely VAT exempt.
As an additional issue, albeit one for another day, the culpability of highly-paid consultants in this evolving crisis, cannot be overstated. Global advisory firms like PwC find themselves in a glaring conflict of interest, reportedly advising the UAE Ministry of Finance on imposing these very taxes, while simultaneously counselling entities like the Dubai Multi Commodities Centre (DMCC) on mitigating them. This duality has only amplified uncertainty, leaving traders in a state of paralysis. One must question what advice these consultants offer their clients in competitive markets, and how they are delivering tangible growth.
Beyond VAT, the additional spectre of B2B taxation and opaque regulation has also made Dubai less competitive. Anecdotal statements from industry stakeholders include fines being issued for unclear reasons, with practically no recourse for contestation due to the absence of any industry ombudsman, while significant taxes and fees are actively pricing out SMEs from the market.
While praise should be given to the UAE government for its equally giant leaps in combatting anti-money laundering and counter terrorism financing, AML regulations have now become more stringent than in any other major centres. Diamantaires in Dubai are effectively being treated like banks, with every transaction above AED 55,000 (USD 15,000) requiring full disclosure. Even an elementary cost comparison with other key markets reveals some startling comparisons. For instance, Belgium has a special corporate incomes tax regime for diamond traders which is reportedly substantially cheaper than Dubai, while any large companies in the emirate paying amounts over USD 3 million in interest (or 30 per cent of EBITDA, whichever is higher) are not eligible for tax deductions, even if paid to banks. Operating expenses in Dubai are also notorious, running an estimated 35 per cent higher than its competitors, while shipment and customs charges are 45 per cent steeper than in Belgium or the U.S. As a result, Dubai has already seen some lab-grown diamond businesses move their operations to Belgium as a direct consequence of these mounting pressures.
This situation echoes the stark warning from Dubai’s pearling legacy, which didn’t vanish due to competition, but inaction in the face of disruptive change. The diamond sector, now a cornerstone of its economic diversification, faces a similar fate. Traders are already voting with their feet, convinced the environment is becoming less hospitable, and once they depart, reclaiming their business will be an insurmountable challenge.
All this being said, this isn’t the first time the UAE has found itself in a similar situation. In the face of mounting pressure on gold and rough diamonds, the UAE Cabinet recognised the imperative for swift action, and on 1st May 2018, decisively reversed the tax on both commodities. This pivotal and wise decision was taken based on a DMCC in-depth analysis of Dubai’s competitive position in the rough diamond trade and not only saved both industries from decline but allowed them to flourish, cementing Dubai’s position as a top global destination.
The same decisive intervention is now urgently required for Dubai’s polished diamond sector. By extending the VAT reverse-charge mechanism consistently to polished diamonds, enhancing corporate tax incentives, easing the administrative burden of AML for legitimate trades, and ensuring regulatory clarity ahead of the corporate tax filing deadline on 30th September 2025, the emirate still has time to avoid both the legal and compliance ambiguities that lead to costly retrospective adjustments. Additionally, this proactive approach will attract high-value polished diamond activity, enabling the emirate to fully leverage its underutilised bonded free zones, while highlighting Dubai’s strategic advantages and robust infrastructure.
Global market volatility and shifting tariff regimes present a timely opportunity for the UAE to assert and uphold itself as a world leader in polished diamonds. Policy enhancements, particularly around taxation and regulation, could yield substantial gains in trade flows, investment, and economic diversification, while unequivocally elevating the UAE’s prestige within the international gemstone sector. Dubai’s diamond empire stands at a crossroads where a sobering assessment of its competitiveness and decisive action will undoubtedly dictate its ongoing success or untimely demise. As there is no finishing line in the search for excellence, the time to act is NOW.
Gem Diamonds has become the latest casualty in a deepening crisis engulfing the global diamond industry, announcing sweeping cost-cutting measures as the market buckles under falling prices and the growing popularity of lab-grown alternatives.
The Africa-focused diamond producer reported a 43% drop in revenue to $44.7 million for the first half of its financial year. Carat sales fell 22% to 44,360, while the average price per carat plunged 26% to $1,008.
In response, it said it would reduce operating costs by $1.4 million to $1.6 million per month and cut around 250 jobs, or 20% of its workforce, at its Letšeng mine in Lesotho. Executives have also taken voluntary salary reductions.
“Considering the prolonged weakness in global diamond prices, compounded by a weak dollar and ongoing US tariff uncertainties, Gem has implemented decisive measures to conserve cash and protect shareholder value,” the company said.
Despite meeting production targets, Gem Diamonds admitted it has not been shielded from sustained pressure on rough diamond prices and adverse currency movements. Investors reacted accordingly, with the company’s shares falling more than 20% in early trading on the London Stock Exchange. They partially rebound to 5.5 pence in late trading, valuing the company at £7.7 million ($10 million).
Gem Diamonds’ measures mirrors those of its peers. just last week, Burgundy Diamond Mines (ASX: BDM) halted open pit operations at its Ekati mine in Canada’s Northwest Territories, triggering mass layoffs.
All three operating diamond mines in the region — Ekati, Diavik and Gahcho Kué — are now facing eventual closure, with Diavik scheduled to close in 2026 and Gahcho Kué expected to cease operations by 2030. Ekati’s long-term future remains uncertain.
Getting worse Signs of a worsening crisis in the diamond sector were already clear in the first three months of 2025. De Beers, the world’s largest producer by value, saw a 44% drop in revenue in Q1 and is sitting on $2 billion in unsold inventory. It plans to cut over 1,000 jobs at its Debswana joint venture in Botswana.
Russia’s Alrosa, hampered by sanctions, reported a 77% plunge in profits and has halted production at key sites.
Petra Diamonds (LON: PDL) is fighting to survive after a 30% drop in sales and the sudden departure of its CEO.
Lucapa (ASX:LOM) entered voluntary administration in Australia, and Sierra Leone’s Koidu Limited shuttered operations and laid off more than 1,000 employees after losing $16 million to labour strikes.
Even Lucara (TSX: LUC), which operates in both Botswana and Canada, has flagged a “going concern” risk despite hitting production records.
All eyes are now on De Beers. Once synonymous with manufactured scarcity and aggressive branding, the company is up for sale. Parent company Anglo American (LON: AAL) has cut its valuation by $4.5 billion in just over a year. No buyers have emerged, but Botswana is reportedly pushing to take a controlling stake.
The number of US jewelry businesses shrank yet again in Q2, according to the latest update from the Jewelers Board of Trade (JBT), which provides commercial credit information.
The figures show a long-term decline continuing at a steady rate, with figures for the last four quarters showing a year-on-year fall of around 3 per cent in the total number of retailers, wholesalers and manufacturers.
The JBT statistics take account of new businesses as well as ceased operations.
The biggest decline, in percentage terms, was manufacturers. There are 104 fewer today than there were a year ago, down 4.7 per cent to 2,104.
There are 516 fewer retailers, down 3.0 per cent to 16,873, and 86 fewer wholesalers, down 2.6 per cent to 3,241.
During Q2 there were 28 closures due to mergers or takeovers, three bankruptcies and 143 businesses that ceased activity for other reasons.
In addition, 561 company credit ratings were downgraded in Q2 2025, and 639 upgraded – compared to 633 downgrades and 663 upgrades in the same quarter previous year.
JBT also provides figures for Canada, which has a far smaller jewelry sector. It shrank by 1.8 per cent.
Botswana president Duma Boko has criticized De Beers for “not doing its job” in an unusually forthright attack.
“Maybe we should take over and sell them (the diamonds) ourselves,” he told an audience last week on a visit to Lesotho, while lamenting his country’s struggling economy.
His comments come just six months after his government signed a long-overdue 10-year sales and mining agreement with De Beers.
His predecessor Mokgweetsi Masisi had threatened on several occasions to walk away from a deal that has been in place since 1969, as he demanded a greater share of the diamonds.
Boko, who swept to power in a surprise victory last October, was seen as less combative in his dealings with De Beers, and quickly got the deal signed, after Masisi’s delays.
But Boko’s comments last week indicate a growing frustration as Botswana battles poverty and high unemployment.
He said diamonds discovered and recovered in Botswana should benefit Botswana.
“So if the diamonds are there, how is the country broke?” he said.
“Now they’re not being sold. Who is selling them? De Beers. Ah, then De Beers is not doing its job. Maybe we should take over and sell them ourselves.
“That’s what we should do. And that would be deemed very radical.
“But the country needs the money and it has the diamonds and somebody who’s supposed to be selling the diamonds is not doing the job.
“Oh, no, and we are simply sitting on our laurels folding up our arms and hoping beyond hope …
“We will take the diamonds and see what we can do with them. They are ours. These diamonds are ours. And so before the end of this year, something very drastic in that space will happen. If it doesn’t happen, we will die trying. By all means.”